The Use of Simulation to Compare Parametric and Nonparametric Multivariate CUSUM Charts under Different Statistical Distributions.

Authors

  • Suhad Rafie Saleh Dept. of Statistics, College of Administration and Economics, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8126-7008
  • Nabaa Naeem Mahdi Dept. of Statistics, College of Administration and Economics, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-5111

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31272/jae.i151.1480

Keywords:

Multivariate Multi-Chart Cumulative Sum (MCUSUM) Chart, Kernel Estimator, Average Run Length (ARL) Criterion

Abstract

Statistical quality control is one of the important statistical tools used for monitoring and analyzing the quality of production and service processes. Its main objective is to provide early detection of any deviations that may occur in the process under study. In this research, a simulation approach was employed to study the performance of the parametric multivariate cumulative sum (MCUSUM) control charts (MC1, MC2) and the nonparametric charts based on the kernel estimator, under three different distributions: the multivariate normal, gamma, and chi-square distributions.

The efficiency of both charts was evaluated using the proposed Composite Average Run Length (CARL) criterion under various mean shifts. The results showed that the nonparametric chart using the kernel estimator was more capable of detecting small and moderate shifts, while the parametric chart was slower in detecting deviations and process changes.

Furthermore, the comparison among the three kernel functions (Gaussian, Laplace, and Epanechnikov) indicated that the Gaussian kernel achieved the highest efficiency in detecting small shifts, followed by the Epanechnikov kernel, whereas the Laplace kernel was the least efficient in this regard. These findings demonstrate that the choice of statistical distribution and kernel function significantly affects the performance of the chart, emphasizing the importance of employing nonparametric methods when the data do not follow a normal distribution, when the true distribution form is unknown, or when they follow other types of distributions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Qiao, L., & Wang, B. (2024). Kernel-Based Multivariate Nonparametric CUSUM Multi-Chart for Detection of Abrupt Changes. Mathematics, 12(10), 1473.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/math12101473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12101473

[2] Liu, L., Yue, J., Lai, X., Huang, J., & Zhang, J. (2019). "Multivariate nonparametric chart for influenza epidemic monitoring". Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, Article 17472. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53908-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53908-6

[3] Enad, F. H. (2020). Using Some Multivariate Non-Parametric Control Chart Methods in Quality Control with a Practical Application (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Baghdad.

[4] Fallahnezhad, M.S., & Ghalichehbaf, A. (2023). "A review on the MCUSUM charts in detecting the shifts of the process with comparison study". International Journal of Innovation in Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 30-38. https://doi.org/10.22105/ijie.2023.364491.1325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59615/ijie.3.2.30

[5] Hamed, M. S., Mansour, M. M., & Abd Elrazik, E. M. (2016). MCUSUM control chart procedure: Monitoring the process mean with application. Journal of Statistics: Advances in Theory and Applications, 16(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.4314/jstat.v16i1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18642/jsata_7100121721

[6] Montgomery, D. C. (2009). " Introduction to statistical quality control ". John Wiley & Sons https://doi.org/0470233975 / 978-0470169922

[7] Qiao, L.; Han, D. (2021). "CUSUM multi-chart for detecting unknown abrupt changes under finite measure space for network observation sequences". Statistics, 2021, 55, 489–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2021.1963236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2021.1943394

[8] Parzen, E. (1962). 'On estimation of a probability density function and mode', Ann. Stat. Vol.33, PP1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704472

[9] Rosenblatt, M. (1956). 'Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function', Ann. Math. Stat. Vol. 27, NO. 3, PP.832–837. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728190

[10] Hammood, M. Y. (2005). A Comparison of Non-Parametric Estimators for Estimating Probability Density Functions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of Administration and Economics, University of Baghdad.

[11] Silverman, B.W. (1986). "Density estimation for statistics and data analysis", Chapman and Hall, Londo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3463-7

[12] Turlach, B. A. (1993). "Bandwidth Selection in Kernel Density Estimation: A Review". C.O.R.E. et InstItut de Statistique. Université Catholique de Louvain.

[13] Abdel, R. and Jetter, J. (2010). "A Simulation Study For The Bandwidth Selection In The Kernel Density Estimation Based On The Exact and the Asymptotic MISE", Pak. J. Statist., Vol. 26, No. (1), pp. 239–265. https://doi.org/10.18187/pjs.v26i1.137

[14] Hotelling, H. Multivariate quality control—Illustrated by the air testing of sample bombsights. In Techniques of Statistical Analysis; Eisenhart, C., Hastay, M.W., Wallis, W.A., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1947; pp. 111–184.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-02

How to Cite

The Use of Simulation to Compare Parametric and Nonparametric Multivariate CUSUM Charts under Different Statistical Distributions. (2026). Journal of Administration and Economics, 51(151), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.31272/jae.i151.1480

Similar Articles

1-10 of 26

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.